Who's engaging with your LinkedIn campaigns, and which of them are worth going after first — combining LinkedIn, website, and HubSpot data into one view per company.
–
Companies — every engaged company as a logo cloud, sized by impressions, clicks, engagements, or rate.
Priority — one ranked table blending LinkedIn engagement + website visits (via Snitcher) into a single score, alongside real HubSpot Leads/MQL/SQL. Filter by industry/size, or save an ICP to jump straight to your ideal companies.
Industries — which industries are engaging most, aggregated across every company, with website pageviews (via Snitcher) alongside.
Company Size — the same breakdown, by employee-size band instead of industry.
Trending — which companies and industries are growing or declining between two periods.
Loading engagement data…
New ICP
Superengaged — high reach + high resonance, go after these first
Broad reach — seen a lot, not landing
Niche · hot — small audience, unusually engaged
Disengaged — low reach, low resonance
New this period
Growing (by engagement)
Declining (by engagement)
Leads trending (HubSpot)
Compares this sync's HubSpot lead count against the immediately preceding sync — HubSpot doesn't track lead counts by calendar period the way LinkedIn engagement does, so this is sync-over-sync, not month-over-month.
Growing
Declining
Dropped off
No engagement data yetThis client's LinkedIn company/industry sync runs weekly. If this was just enabled, the first data lands after the next sync run — check back within a week, or trigger it manually via Worker A's /sync?type=linkedin-engagement.
